Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Events Cause Mariners To Lose To Rangers

Does the Bell Toll For Gary Bettman Now?

When I opened up my morning copy of the Tennessean and saw the headline "Del Biaggio may have skirted full NHL review," that grabbed my attention. When I then saw a picture of NHL commissioner Gary Bettman underneath Boots Del Biaggio's, with the caption "may have given Del Biaggio special treatment," I had to sit down, because this looked the beginning of the end for Bettman's reign as commissioner. Major kudos, by the way, for Brad Schrade, the Tennessean writer who is leading the way with this story.

The main gist is that Doug Bergeron, who at one time was poised to invest in Del Biaggio's minority share, claims the following:

Bergeron said Del Biaggio told him in December that National Hockey League Commissioner Gary Bettman's office had given special permission for Del Biaggio to buy a share of the team without being subjected to all the scrutiny the league usually gives to prospective owners. Del Biaggio told him the commissioner's office did not require him to show audited financial statements before it approved him.

"Boots bragged to me that he was able to convince Bettman's office to overlook the need for his audited financial statements because it was too much work," Bergeron said.

Bettman himself told Bergeron that he helped arrange the agreement that Del Biaggio had with the Predators' local owners, Bergeron said.

There are really two big whammys here: the first, obviously, is that the NHL potentially took a shortcut with Del Biaggio's background check, a gaffe that is blowing up in the worst way possible. The second, however, speaks to Bettman's involvement, if not his seminal role, in the arrangement of a "put right", which requires a bit of explanation...

The "put right" (as found in the draft version of the ownership group's operating agreement) basically gives the Series A shareholder (Forecheck Holdings, Del Biaggio's investment firm) a way out of the Predators in the event that they were to buy into a different NHL team, get awarded an expansion NHL team, or if the rest of the ownership group failed financially, like going into default on loan payments. But come on, what kind of NHL owner would default on a loan, right? How wacky would that be?

Anyways, if Forecheck Holdings exercised that right, the rest of the ownership would be forced to buy out the Series A shares within 120 days. If they didn't, Forecheck would gain operational control of the team. Basically, this is a financial protection clause for Forecheck, offering them a way out if a majority ownership opportunity came along, or the Predators sank like a rock and failed to meet financial obligations.

Now remember, the story here is that Bergeron claims these two things, and that doesn't necessarily make them true (especially with Del Biaggio's credibility these days). The NHL responded in the piece by saying that Del Biaggio was "treated in a consistent manner as with the applications of other prospective owners," and David Freeman, the leader of the local ownership group, replied that the league office wasn't "involved in structuring it or developing it" with respect to the operating agreement and the put right.

If this is the truth, however, this could represent a situation that might finally bring about the fall of Gary Bettman, which some (especially hockey fans in Canada) have been awaiting for years. In yesterday's Globe and Mail, Stephen Brunt cut the commissioner some slack, writing that Del Biaggio had put Bettman in an "awkward position" after having backed him as a savior for Nashville while turning Jim Balsillie aside. He wrote,
After surely undertaking the necessary due diligence, Bettman must have believed that Del Biaggio offered the best chance to achieve his oft-stated goal: saving hockey in Nashville.
Today's story undercuts that charitable stance twice; firstly, by alleging that due diligence wasn't performed, and secondly, because Bettman knew of, and played a role in crafting, a mechanism by which Del Biaggio could assume control of the franchise. To many, pushing Jim Balsillie aside was bad enough. To do so without thoroughly vetting Del Biaggio, and to help structure an agreement that could result in an abrupt change of control like this, smacks of preferential treatment that would be hard to justify.

I can't wait to see how the hockey press eats this one up...


Comment 6 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from On the Forecheck

A hoe-down in Pred Town

Jan 2007 by Dirk Hoag - 0 comments

Preds Chomp Ducks in OT

Jan 2007 by Dirk Hoag - 2 comments

Runnin' Away With The Central

Jan 2007 by Dirk Hoag - 2 comments

Will the Predators Strike Again?

Feb 2007 by Dirk Hoag - 0 comments

The End of an Era

Feb 2007 by Dirk Hoag - 0 comments

Comments

Display:

Don't get me wrong - I think Bettman, for all he's done for Nashville, should probably go for a number of reasons. But doesn't it make sense that a guy who was already a minority owner in the Sharks (and presumably went through auditing to get that share) wouldn't have to go through auditing again to essentially switch ownership from one team to another? He wasn't "joining the ranks of NHL owners" - he already was one.

There is a WHOLE lot about this situation that stinks, but i don't think this is one of them. As Freeman put it on the radio the other day: Del Biaggio fooled people a lot more savvy in financial dealings than the NHL. Even with an audit i don't know if it would have made a difference.

by Paul Nicholson on Jul 17, 2008 9:33 AM EDT reply actions  

I would think that Del Biaggio would be subject to a check, simply because his role in the Predators ownership group was an order of magnitude greater than his role with the Sharks, from what I understand, particularly with the clause that could have given him operational control. As part of such a huge deal, you'd think that scrutiny would be a matter of protocol. After all, what are they saving by taking that shortcut? A few thousand bucks? That's a small price to pay for greater confidence in a $180 million transaction.

Now, would an audit have caught Del Biaggio in his lies? Probably not, as you say, considering the fraud allegations and multiple lawsuits pending. But that doesn't excuse the check never having been made. I think it's definitely another round of ammunition for the Bettman-haters.

Personally, I'm ambivalent about Bettman; I think he's been solid in some respects, but middling to poor on others.

by The Forechecker on Jul 17, 2008 9:58 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm not sure that the deal the way it was constructed was necessarily different than what he had in San Jose. Its pretty common in any partnership contract for all parties to have clauses on how they can buy out the others. There were clauses on how he could take over the Preds, and clauses on how Freeman & Co could buy him out if/when he wanted to leave. It would have been very unusual for the San Jose contract to not have had similar clauses, even if the implications or odds of them being implemented were arguably lower there.

I'd also be willing to bet that Craig Leipold didn't get re-audited when he bought the Wild. If he was, then this is a story. If he wasn't, then move on.

by Paul Nicholson on Jul 17, 2008 11:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Bettman is a crook and is ruining the NHL, not running it. He should have been gone a long time ago.

http://www.FireBettman.com

by Anonymous on Jul 17, 2008 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Having a put right that spells out how you can cash out your position is one thing, but Del Biaggio's had language in there that potentially had him taking over the team. I would be stunned if he had that kind of language in his San Jose deal, as he was much more of a minority player there.

by The Forechecker on Jul 17, 2008 11:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Dirk, Paul is correct in that put/call rights are routine in shareholder agreements, particularly for preferred share structures.

The notion that FDel Biaggio had any effective means of "taking over the team" is, to be concise, balderdash. The only means by which he had the ability to assume control is if the other parties effectively abandoned ship. All the other owners collectively had to do was to purchase Del Biaggio's interest. To suggest that they could not pony up $30 million collectively when control over their investment is at stake is remote to put it mildly.

by Gerald on Jul 17, 2008 10:50 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog about the Nashville Predators.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
So apparently Suter is 86 out the door
Josiah_small
My Roster Proposal for the Predators...Give Me Yours
Small
Whats the cost for the "Big-2"
Gameon100_small
Miss: A Recurring Theme
Preds_game_small
Moving on from Game 4
Sackboy_small
Why are the Preds so streaky?
Preds_game_small
What was gained, or lost, in Game 4
Predhead_small
Intent to Blow
E-pred_small
We're all talkin about it. Let's make it official.....
Small
Because it's the Red Solo Cup

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >

Best of Nashville 2011 - Best Sports Blog

About OTF

is the Forechecker, churner of NHL stats & analysis, and managing editor of On the Forecheck.

Me_medium_medium

Got a question, a suggestion, or are interested in advertising here to reach thousands of Nashville Predators fans? Feel free to email the.forechecker@gmail.com.

Are you new here? Read this first!

On The Forecheck Community Guideilnes

Check us out on iTunes!

Otf_podcast_medium


Managers

Forechecker_35_small Dirk Hoag

Muckers

Rad_small Chris Burton

Grinders

Kanye_pekka_small Sam Page

91490_obit_heimerdinger_football_small Aditya T (smashville)

Adslogo_small Ryan B. Miller

209353_10150193095230917_581960916_8380447_5205638_o_small Marc Torrence

Enforcers

Infinite_sadness_avatar_small 3DLink

Photo_on_2011-12-09_at_00 davisca