NHL VP Campbell ducks the elbows issue
This morning's Tennessean has a bizarre bit on the Tootoo-Staubitz fight from last week's Predators vs. Sharks game, which included several elbows thrown by Staubitz that broke Tootoo's nose:
"Do we see anything wrong with the Staubitz-Tootoo fight? At the moment no," NHL Vice President Colin Campbell, who handles league discipline, said in an e-mail. "A player can leave his glove on to fight if he wants, so if he was hitting him with a piece of equipment that was worn legally there is no rule in place for that. If he hit him with an elbow instead of a fist there is no rule to prevent that at the moment."
Interesting... so if rules regarding elbows to the head don't apply during a fight, then I guess it's OK to just grab your stick and cross-check an opponent in the face? Fair's fair after all, Mr. Campbell!
For those who need a refresher, here's the video of the fight. It started out as your basic, high-tempo scrap, but once the elbows started landing (the 1st at the 19 second mark of the video) Tootoo's nose, and resolve, crumbled:
What makes Campbell's stance even more bizarre is the contrast between this hands-off approach to one player using his equipment as a weapon to cause injury to another player, and the response his office took to Sean Avery's antics in the playoffs last year:
Now, that was a situation that didn't involve any harm occuring to any of the parties involved, and in fact could have been handled on the ice, at least if any of the Devils could have lived up to Scott Stevens' example in how to defend your goalie's space. But Colin Campbell rode quickly to the rescue in that case, to ensure that such madness would not be tolerated.
By the way, the relevant section of the NHL rulebook regarding elbowing is included below. It certainly seems like Staubitz should have gotten a major penalty and a Game Misconduct for his work, although to give the refs credit things happened so fast that many observers didn't pick up on this until seeing a replay. All the same, the league office has room to hand down supplementary discipline, or at least clarify that such tactics are not to be tolerated going forward. These aren't the old days when elbow pads were just a wad of cotton; oftentimes they have hard plastic shells, and make viscious weapons when used like Staubitz did here. The NHL should (and easily could) clarify that elbow shots like this are not to be tolerated. If not, what's next? A guy using his skate to go "Richard Zednik" on an opponent?
Rule 46 - Elbowing
46.1 Elbowing - Elbowing shall mean the use of an extended elbow in a
manner that may or may not cause injury.46.2 Minor Penalty - The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a minor
penalty, based on the degree of violence, to a player or goalkeeper
guilty of elbowing an opponent.46.3 Major Penalty - A major penalty, at the discretion of the Referee,
shall be imposed on any player or goalkeeper who uses his elbow to
foul an opponent. A major penalty must be imposed under this rule
for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or head of an opponent (see
46.5).46.4 Match Penalty - The Referee, at his discretion, may assess a match
penalty if, in his judgment, the player or goalkeeper attempted to or
deliberately injured his opponent by elbowing.46.5 Game Misconduct Penalty - When a major penalty is imposed under
this rule for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or head of an
opponent, a game misconduct penalty shall also be imposed.46.6 Fines and Suspensions - When a major penalty and a game
misconduct is assessed for a foul resulting in an injury to the face or
head of an opponent, an automatic fine of one hundred dollars ($100)
shall be imposed.If deemed appropriate, supplementary discipline can be applied by
the Commissioner at his discretion (refer to Rule 29).
0 recs |
10 comments
|
Comments
I have waited and expected some type of response from the league in reference to the hit made on JP and the incident with tootoo. In both cases the infractions of the rules were deliberate and intentional. (Weber incident is another example, he could have ended up with serious head and or neck problems – even leading to death or paralysis.) Now that the league has ignored these situations , the rule book will be ignored until someone in the league decides a player, say like tootoo, (who has fought cleanly but is perceived as "dirty") uses the same tactic and THEN the rules will be applied. The players union should also be vocal on the intent issue to prevent major injuries and perhaps death.
by EXPECTATIONS on Mar 26, 2009 9:53 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Double Standard
Had the same thing occurred to one or the league darlings (eg Sid the Kid) Staubitz would have gotten five games for touching him in any fashion, another 20 for flagrant use of the elbows and a Sean Avery-type overnight rule change.
Unfortunately, since it was Toots and there are thousands of Tootoo haters out there I’m sure many felt that Jordin got what he deserved.
Change the parties involved and it would be a completely different response from the league office. I probably won’t be able to call in, but that would be an excellent question for Bettman on his show on XM today at 3-5 Central. Someone please make the call!
Buddy Oakes
by PredsOnTheGlass on Mar 26, 2009 10:05 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This topic so inflamed my sense of justice, I just had to post a comment to the nhl site. I know nothing will be addressed, but at least I gave my opinion of the blatent disregard of the rule book UNTIL a player that is perceived as a “dirty” player uses the same “tactic” (Not that I expect tootoo to intentionally use this method to destroy someone) and THEN the rulebook will apply.
by EXPECTATIONS on Mar 26, 2009 10:13 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
double standard
There is quite obviously a double standard when it comes to assessing penalties. Is the league trying to push down a “if you dish it out, you should take it” attitude? I don’t know. A rule should be a rule though.
They are travelling down a thin, curvy road by handling this on a case-by-case, party-by-party manner.
by kakemono on Mar 26, 2009 10:17 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I don’t even care about the parties involved, I’m just stunned that the league is turning a blind eye to these elbow shots. With the hard-shell pads that many players use, there are going to be lots of broken faces if this isn’t stamped out immediately. All it takes is a simple declaration that such shots are considered an Elbow with Intent to Injure, and would result in an extra major and a Game Misconduct.
In other words, enforce the rules already in the books. It’s a common sense measure that doesn’t detract from the already-existing state of NHL fighting.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
by Dirk Hoag on Mar 26, 2009 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Isn’t there an inherent problem in calling any penalty that involves “intent to injure” if it’s during a fight? Isn’t intending to injure the whole point?
Now clearly there should be some lines drawn.. no guns.. no brass knuckles.. but couldn’t you make the case that throwing an elbow is ok, at least if you take off the pads? I mean, you are in a fight afterall..
by Matthew Dirt on Mar 26, 2009 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
As previously stated this is the perfect example of the double standard that Campbell has exhibited the entire season.
Campbell has proven that he is incompetent at his job and needs to be replaced ASAP or actions like these and many others will continue to go on and possibly even increase.
by pyle on Mar 26, 2009 10:58 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Colin Campbell has never been consistent with anything when it comes to discipline. Right now there is no hard line on how to call anything flagrant and it just makes the league that much more of a bush league.
by Zachary Zielonka on Mar 26, 2009 11:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I agree that if someone is fighting and just throwing elbows than there should be an extra penalty involved – but I’m honestly not sure that Staubitz really intended to throw an elbow..
To me it looks like he’s throwing punches that miss or rake across Tootoo’s face and the follow-thru causes an elbow to connect. I’m not sure you can really penalize that…
by Matthew Dirt on Mar 26, 2009 1:02 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
maybe one time – but continuous hitting with the elbow pads is beyond just a fair fight
by EXPECTATIONS on Mar 26, 2009 4:09 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 


















