How much does your favorite team travel? Check the NHL Super Schedule
With the release of the 2009-10 NHL Regular Season schedule, a favorite summer pasttime of hockey fans (and some team officials) in many cities is about to commence; whining about the burdens of travel, and how the NHL office has the fix in to screw team XYZ out of a successful campaign. Either there are too many long trips, or too many short trips, or too many time zone changes... it seems like just about any aspect of the schedule is picked on as especially painful.
Over the course of the season, however, which teams truly travel more than the others, and which ones play the most games on back-to-back nights? For the answer to those and other questions, I'd like to share with you the 2009-10 NHL Super Schedule, a freely available spreadsheet that I publish, which includes travel distances between each NHL game, days elapsed since the previous game, etc.
Follow after the jump for a look at the spreadsheet, and an overview of travel and back-to-back totals by team...
I'll put the summary right up here at the top. We've got year-to-year comparisons of total travel miles (measured as the crow files from one NHL arena to the next), and the number of back-to-back games that are on each team's schedule. Teams with low mileage and back-to-backs are shaded green, and the harsher numbers are shaded pink:
| Team | 2008-9 Miles | 2009-10 Miles | Diff | 2008-9 B2B | 2009-10 B2B | Diff |
| Anaheim Ducks | 47910 | 49068 | +1158 | 18 | 17 | -1 |
| Atlanta Thrashers | 42172 | 37768 | -4404 | 15 | 16 | +1 |
| Boston Bruins | 30865 | 34969 | +4104 | 16 | 17 | +1 |
| Buffalo Sabres | 30542 | 25911 | -4631 | 17 | 18 | +1 |
| Calgary Flames | 52941 | 55331 | +2390 | 14 | 14 | 0 |
| Carolina Hurricanes | 37958 | 38360 | +402 | 14 | 16 | +2 |
| Chicago Blackhawks | 38557 | 43417 | +4860 | 16 | 19 | +3 |
| Colorado Avalanche | 47889 | 43405 | -4484 | 8 | 16 | +8 |
| Columbus Blue Jackets | 41305 | 40410 | -895 | 20 | 12 | -8 |
| Dallas Stars | 51541 | 51182 | -359 | 15 | 12 | -3 |
| Detroit Red Wings | 39642 | 42477 | +2835 | 16 | 13 | -3 |
| Edmonton Oilers | 49941 | 49191 | -750 | 16 | 11 | -5 |
| Florida Panthers | 44178 | 47873 | +3695 | 12 | 18 | +6 |
| Los Angeles Kings | 44917 | 45682 | +765 | 15 | 12 | -3 |
| Minnesota Wild | 44083 | 43599 | -484 | 17 | 15 | -2 |
| Montreal Canadiens | 32128 | 38029 | +5901 | 13 | 16 | +3 |
| Nashville Predators | 40958 | 39749 | -1209 | 13 | 15 | +2 |
| New Jersey Devils | 29289 | 31340 | +2051 | 18 | 19 | +1 |
| New York Islanders | 28126 | 31550 | +3424 | 17 | 19 | +2 |
| New York Rangers | 34603 | 33615 | -988 | 15 | 13 | -2 |
| Ottawa Senators | 31828 | 34338 | +2510 | 16 | 11 | -5 |
| Philadelphia Flyers | 29510 | 29087 | -437 | 18 | 16 | -2 |
| Phoenix Coyotes | 51233 | 49707 | -1526 | 16 | 13 | -3 |
| Pittsburgh Penguins | 32277 | 29691 | -2586 | 13 | 16 | +3 |
| San Jose Sharks | 56111 | 46415 | -9696 | 14 | 13 | -1 |
| St. Louis Blues | 41248 | 44971 | +3723 | 19 | 18 | -1 |
| Tampa Bay Lightning | 45812 | 37722 | -8090 | 16 | 12 | -4 |
| Toronto Maple Leafs | 33240 | 32313 | -927 | 13 | 18 | +5 |
| Vancouver Canucks | 51206 | 48221 | -2985 | 11 | 14 | +3 |
| Washington Capitals | 28321 | 33561 | +5240 | 13 | 13 | 0 |
| Average | 40344 | 40782 | 15.1 | 15.1 |
UPDATE: Corrections made to some teams (Vancouver, Washington, etc.) which have road games on both sides of the Olympic break. Also corrected for teams that went to Europe last year, but those travel miles carried over into the first run of this spreadsheet.
A few notes to consider:
- The NHL schedule makers should be given credit for not increasing the number of back-to-backs, given the Olympic Break which has to be wedged into the same overall timetable. How'd they do this? Well, there are many more games on the total schedule which have one day off in between (1,359 in the upcoming season, as opposed to 1,250 last year). Just as games after 1 day off have gone up, games after 2, 3, or 4 days off have gone down by a similar amount (682 to 581). So basically the NHL took those longer breaks and compressed down quite a bit, while avoiding a rash of back-to-backs. Kudos to them on that score.
- We also see a bit less variance in the number of back-to-backs. Last season, Colorado had just 8 while Columbus had 20, while this year the gap runs from 11 to 19.
- In terms of mileage, it looks like Mike Gillis was successful in lobbying the NHL for relief for his Vancouver Canucks, as they saw a significant reduction in their travel mileage.
The obvious question then is, which team has the hardest or easiest road to travel in the 2009-10 Regular Season? Is it Calgary based on pure mileage, or Chicago which has plenty of flying time, but also the most back-to-backs?
At least now, if you're going to complain about your favorite team's schedule, at least you can do so in an informed manner!
Below is a brief sample of what the spreadsheet looks like. You can access the 2009-10 Google Spreadsheet on your own and download a copy to work with as you wish. There's also the 2008-9 Super Schedule, and the 2007-8 Super Schedule, also via Google Docs, if you wish to run year-to-year comparisons. When you follow the links, you'll get all the columns, which include mileage along with strength of schedule information (various stats for the opponent in a given game).
Also, if you have any questions, feel free to ask in the comments, email me (the.forechecker @ gmail.com) or catch me on Twitter (@Forechecker).
For discounted tickets to any Nashville Predators home game, you can follow this link and use the special offer code "PREDS".
5 recs |
17 comments
|
Comments
Excellent stuff.
Fear The Fin: Where Selling Your Soul Is The Likely Solution
by Mr. Plank on Jul 16, 2009 2:00 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Let’s just see how many times we can get this thing retweeted…
Blogging on hockey at fromtherink.com
by James Mirtle on Jul 16, 2009 2:06 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
This is an amazing breakdown. Great job! I’ve already referenced it for information.
The Cannon -- A Columbus Blue Jackets Blog
Follow me on Twitter
by Andy Newman on Jul 16, 2009 10:30 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Once again
Thanks for this… It’s awesome
Second City Hockey - Blackhawks, Beers, Beards & Blasphemy
by Matthew Dirt on Jul 16, 2009 11:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A great step...
away from mindless whining toward informed criticism. Many thanks.
by Hockey Hillbilly on Jul 16, 2009 11:40 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Holy. Cr*p.
Kudos to you, fine sir. Your tremendous amount of work puts the rest of us bloggers to shame.
by HabsFan29 on Jul 16, 2009 5:33 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A tip of the helmet to you sir. The bar has been raised.
While the calculator is still warm and the schedules handy, how many back-to-back games involve travel between towns? Though two games in 24 hours certainly sucks, squeezing travel between towns is the killer. I’d love to know the answer as it’s my favorite scheduling issue to whine about. Length of road trip without returning home would be another point of interest.
http://puckreport.blogspot.com
MG
by puckreport on Jul 16, 2009 9:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
A quick answer to this is that out of 452 back-to-back sets, only 33 of them have a team playing at home in both games. There could be instances where a team plays at the Rangers and Devils on consecutive nights, so that would probably be counted as well, but the vast majority of back-to-backs involve travel (stay tuned tomorrow for more on that topic).
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
by Dirk Hoag on Jul 17, 2009 1:56 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Wow! This list is simply interesting.
Finding out that the Rangers travel more than the Isles, devils or even flyers is even more interesting.
by Justinleon on Jul 16, 2009 10:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
My question is...
Is the fact that one team will travel back between two road games taken into account?
by The Nacho Fan on Jul 17, 2009 12:26 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
With the exception of the Olympic break, the distances are from the location of one game to the next. There could be instances where a team may have 3 or 4 days off between two road games and decides to go home in between, but those are individual team decisions.
When a team has a road game on each side of the Olympic break, however, I did factor in a trip home in between.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
by Dirk Hoag on Jul 17, 2009 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
How 'bout that?!
You, sir, have been cited in Montreal’s French daily La Presse. Probably only because the hapless Canadiens have the highest increase in mileage, nonetheless I think something to be proud of. Again, thanks for this gem!
by The Nacho Fan on Jul 18, 2009 12:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
With as much as athletes get paid, I have a hard time listening to them complain about travel time.
by pdxorfan on Jul 18, 2009 2:08 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Opening in Sweden.
You did add the 6,000 some miles of travel for the Blues and Red Wings to travel to and from Sweden for their season openers, there, right?
by KindaChang on Jul 21, 2009 1:07 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Yes I did, each of those 4 teams has 0 miles between Games 1 & 2, then a long trip back to North America for Game 3 of their respective schedules.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
by Dirk Hoag on Jul 22, 2009 3:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Mistake in Spreadsheet regarding the Rangers
Hey, first off this is fantastic. A truly excellent job!
I did, however, notice a mistake in the mileage calculation for the Rangers for the upcoming season. The google spreadsheet says that the Rangers trip to New Jersey on October 5, which follows a home game against Ottawa on October 3rd, is 4,071 miles in length! I believe this number comes from last year’s trip to Prague as the Prague – New York distance is 4,071 miles. Anyway, the correct figure there should be 9 miles, meaning the Rangers only travel 33,299 this season.
I did find it curious that the Rangers traveled so much more than each of their Atlantic division rivals, and with this adjustment, the Rangers still travel the most in the Atlantic, but only slightly more than Pittsburgh. Could you update the spreadsheet and the data?
Thanks!
by Blue Seat on Jul 27, 2009 2:04 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs

by 


















