Jordin Tootoo's "charge" - will it result in suspension?
Jordin Tootoo received a major penalty and a game misconduct for "charging" St. Louis defenseman Carlo Colaiacovo in tonight's 3-0 loss to the Blues, a call which will presumably bring a review by the NHL for possible supplementary discipline.
Here's the video from YouTube courtesy of user NHLArchive:
The St. Louis broadcasters, of course, take the homer perspective. As Barry Trotz said in the post-game press conference, however, Tootoo didn't take a stride from the top of the circles in, he didn't leave his feet, and he hit Colaiacovo shoulder-to-shoulder. But since the Blues defenseman went down, and stayed down, the referees made a reaction call, and when they saw #22, they piled on the extras.
If that occurs with most players in the league, that play gets included in the highlights as rough & tumble hockey, but Tootoo draws attention from the officials even though he has brought a great deal of discipline to his game in recent years.
So I ask you - do you think this hit will result in a suspension? I'm not asking should it, because frankly you can make a very strong argument that no penalty at all should have resulted from the play. But do you think Colin Campbell will drop the hammer on him?
60 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
You Don't Need to Wear a "Tin Foil Hat"
to realize that Jordin Tootoo was jobbed by the referees. He committed no penalty at all. In fact, the refs made no call until Colaiacovo stayed down on the ice. Only then did they decide to issue the “charging” call and a game misconduct penalty. Tootoo did not stride into Colaiacovo and he hit him squarely shoulder-to-shoulder. This was one of the NHL’s “reputation” calls based on Tootoo’s actions three or four years ago. It was completely wrong. It also effectively terminated the game. With the ridiculous non-calls thus far this season, it makes an utter mockery of the league’s expressed attempt to reduce the level of headshots this season. The referees’ actions leave a very disagreeable stench.
by Hockey Hillbilly on Oct 29, 2010 6:07 AM EDT reply actions
WOW
when reading thru the thread last night i noticed the pred fans cryed foul and a couple blues fans just cried, which is typical for most calls like this, BUT that wasnt even a penalty. trotz was right on when he said he didnt stride from the dot forward, didnt leave his feet and it sure looks like shoulder to shoulder to me. wheres the penalty? typical nhl ref reacting to 1) tootoo and 2) an injured player. where was that mentality for backstrom. oh, i forgot hes a cap and a star.
Where's the Blues penalty?
Maybe he left his feet…he’s 5’9"!! The other Blues forward immediately dropped his gloves looking for retaliation on Tootoo. Where’s his penalty for unsportsmanlike? This B.S. call ended any chance the Preds had in making a comeback. The REF should be suspended and fined for their actions in the game. It was a ridiculous call. Other than his game misconduct I thought this could’ve been Tootoo’s best overall game I’ve seen him play. You can tell Trotz is much more comfortable in putting him a position to play quality minutes. I just hope a suspension doesn’t change his focus this season.
i'll be shocked....
if there’s no suspension. from what it sounds like (didn’t see the game, and can’t see the vid here) the hit shouldn’t have even been a penalty. However, the NHL has a habit of suspending players based on the RESULTS of hits, and not the actual hit itself. because the player went down and stayed down, it sounds like the wheel of justice will spin again.
TN Sports fan in Hoosier Country....
saw the video...
FINALLY. what hit were the announcers watching? he came in shoulder to shoulder. he stopped making strides at the faceoff dot. i don’t even see how it’s a blindside hit. the blues player was skating directly into Toot’s hit. ridiculous.
TN Sports fan in Hoosier Country....
the hilarious bit is the shopping of replays by the blue’s announcers. “uh this one looks like a shoulder to shoulder hit” “and this angle here clearly was a head shot” it’s complete crap. it was a clean hit. toots did not leave his feet, did not take any strides into the player. the player was in an active zone and had the puck. it’s part of the game.
the saddest part of this is the coverage on the blues side of the SBN affiliate. not quite as “pro” over there…
that would be his second cheap shot he’s had against the blues. why wouldn’t he square off and fight polak like real man…
Because it was a clean hit
And he didn’t think he was going to get a phantom 5 minute major and game misconduct for a clean hit.
Tootoo was trying to spark a late surge by the Predators. Instead the referees decided to end the game by assessing those penalties only after play continued and Colaiacovo never got up. What actually lead to the whistle being blown was the gloved punch and dropping of the gloves by Stratchan, not the hit. But alas in the end, not only did the refs decide to makeup the call, but they also didn’t penalize Stratchan for either his gloved punch to Tootoo’s head or dropping his gloves or the multiple crosschecks Boyes delivered to Tootoo’s back.
Bottom line, Tootoo knew his hit was clean and did his job as the agitator. Stratchan and/or Boyes should have been the ones penalized and the Preds should have gone on the power play. That’s why Tootoo didn’t drop his gloves, because he never thought the refs would make a phantom call and throw him out. If he knew that, he’s definitely dropping and taking another Blue out with him.
I have no problem whatsoever with Tootoo not dropping his gloves. It was the smart play, but unfortunately in the end, the refs couldn’t get out of their own way to see it that way…
Predators Hockey: Live it, Love it...
Follow me on Twitter: @SLakePreds
by Seth Lake on Oct 29, 2010 9:19 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
So you’re saying that TooToo wouldn’t drop the gloves because he was an intricate part of comeback. Last time I checked you still need to put the puck in the goal. He served his purpose and tried to get a spark. Now man up and accept the consequences
by Bleedin Blu on Oct 29, 2010 10:03 AM EDT up reply actions
He’s had a history of shady hits as well, that’s not gonna help him in this situation either on the suspension…
by Bleedin Blu on Oct 29, 2010 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions
There's no suspension coming...
And why if your trying to draw a power play down by two goals late are you going to drop your gloves and fight someone who’s already thrown a gloved punch and dropped his gloves leading to the whistle being blown.
Tootoo delivered a hard, but clean hit. The Blues were the only ones to clearly commit a penalty in this instance (3 as a matter of fact), but the referees made an awful call and not only ignored all three STL penalties, but made a phantom call on Tootoo based on the result of the hit and his reputation.
You got your reputation call there. Don’t be expecting another one now…
Predators Hockey: Live it, Love it...
Follow me on Twitter: @SLakePreds
by Seth Lake on Oct 29, 2010 10:24 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Trying to draw calls
by not dropping the gloves, too often, in cases where he should be dropping the gloves. Last game, he was challenged half way up the ice by a Blue before taking a swing when the other guy wasn’t ready.
This time, the guys were ready, and tootoo pretended he wasn’t even there.
No class. No guts. Probably would have tdropped the gloves and thrown a punch Strachan if he was looking the other way.
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Last game
Why fight an AHL callup who’s trying to spark his team?
You clearly hate Tootoo and can’t look past that to see this objectively. I won’t defend anyone for crossing the line and not respecting his opponent and the game, but last night Tootoo didn’t do anything wrong…
Predators Hockey: Live it, Love it...
Follow me on Twitter: @SLakePreds
by Seth Lake on Oct 29, 2010 11:16 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
in fact
I thought Jordin showed a lot of discipline in not cleaning Strachan’s clock for punching him in the face with his glove on.
by Chris Burton on Oct 29, 2010 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Why did Burrows fight Tootoo 1 minute into the following game?
Because it was the right thing to do.
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Burrows didn’t really have a choice after what he did to Dumont.
by Chris Burton on Oct 29, 2010 11:40 AM EDT up reply actions
Of course he had the choice.
He could have not dropped the gloves, like Tootoo does so often.
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
Tootoo does that because he’s more disciplined than he used to be. There’s a good chance if someone punches him and he doesn’t retaliate, Nashville’s going on the power play.
by Chris Burton on Oct 29, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions
Don’t bother with this guy. He can’t stand the Predators and he loathes Jordin Tootoo and, for reasons known only to him, lets the world know it on this site devoted to the Predators. You have much better uses for your time.
by Hockey Hillbilly on Oct 29, 2010 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions
Ah yes
The ‘if you don’t agree with us, you must be wrong’ mantra.
I guess I should just bow down and sing the praises of Tootoo, because, hey, I’m a Preds fan, and I’m supposed to love Toots, think Predator players do no wrong, and only taste defeat when its the refs.
You’ll excuse me if I don’t get in line with the other sheep and blind Tootoo (and for that matter, Trotz, Erat and Legwand) apologists. You, however, feel free to continue singing the party line.
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
not being a sheep is fine.
but do you understand that there are legitimate reasons for not fighting beyond just cowardice?
a player randomly trying to fight tootoo can be called for a penalty if tootoo decides not to fight. just because he is challenged it doesn’t mean that tootoo has to fight him, especially if it would be a really stupid decision based on timing and momentum in the game.
tootoo has learned when it is beneficial to fight and when it’s not. and i think you are confusing this for cowardice.
"It's gonna be fun on the bun."
Other pests
answer the bell after questionable hits, even the most “cowardly” ones like Burrows and Cooke. For a supposed tough middleweight, our guy does not.
And it isn’t random, its in response to a taking liberties with one’s teammate with a hard hit.
Nashville players would do the same, you would hope, for a teammate. Game situation considered, always trying to draw a penalty instead of owning up to the hit, is somewhat cowardly. Ever noticed it takes him forever to get up off the ice when he gets knocked down, and he’s always looking up to the refs trying to encourage a call? Our boy dives more than most.
Tootoo is far more ‘brave’ when the other guy isn’t ready and square.
Again, I know I am preaching to the Tootoo boosters some of which will defend everything he has ever done, every charge, late hit, elbow, high hit, suckerpunch, and the Robidas incident.
But there is a reason why he has his rep, with other NHLers, and with the refs.
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 7:02 PM EDT up reply actions
The Robidas incident?
1. Tootoo put a legal hit on Modano
2. Robidas was coming at Tootoo with speed, with his stick and with retribution in mind.
3. Tootoo, with his gloves still on, AND as he was being cross-checked, hit Robidas.
4. Robidas is knocked unconscious.
5. Modano hits Tootoo with his stick. Let me repeat that: Modano hit Tootoo with his stick, an overhand stick swing, one of the most flagrant violations of sportmanship in hockey I have witnessed.
6. Daley, in a third man in situation, tries to fight Tootoo.
Please stop referring to this ‘incident’ as proof of anything that Tootoo does wrong. Tootoo should not even have been suspended.
At other times, sure, he has done some less than honorable things.
Joke
Robidas coming in with speed?
That happens all the time, every game.
Players get their hands up to defend themselves. Push, shove. Not swing wildly to to the head.
Again, joke you think Modano’s weak, one armed, slash was a ‘flagrant’ violation. It wasn’t even a slash, considering he had no force behind it.
You clearly are one of those “duncan keith water bottle cost us the series” folks who see the Preds through Crisp/Bubba colored glasses.
Sorry, but the ‘incident’ is proof that he has done something wrong. He has done some less than honorable things many times, but that’s on the record for needless, excessively reacting and giving a guy a 5 game concussion. And, appropriately, getting suspended 5 games. Justice.
Of course, he gets in the first punch before the other is set a bunch of times. Borderline cheap and classless, every single time. But once, certainly suspension worthy. Don’t like it? Get in line with all the other sheep.
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 11:03 PM EDT up reply actions
1. Thank you for agreeing the hit on Modano was legal. Point to me.
2. If you say Robidas comes flying in every game looking to crosscheck someone with retribution in mind, so be it. We agree that he deserved whatever he got. Point to me.
3. Swinging wildly to the head? Hardly. Unless Robidas was coming in to kiss Toots, he got what he deserved. I’ll call this a tie, as it is (cough) objective.
5. You agree that Modano swung his stick over his head and hit Tootoo. Point to me.
So, we can, finally, agree that there is NO Robidas ‘incident’.
You cry that he gets the first punch in? As soon as a player starts jawing for a fight he better be ready for a fight.
You think like most people around the league, and the refs, and Toronto, about Tootoo.
That makes YOU the SHEEP.
YOU.
SHEEP.
For the record, the first time I saw Keith’s water bottle incident, I laughed. The second time I saw it, I watched the reaction of the guy he was squirting it at, and then I laughed again. Because it was funny.
DONTFEEDTHESHEEP!
again, joke
Players skate up to scrums all the time. How often do you see players greeted with a sock to the face?
Tootoo: 5 game suspension. Reputation amongst his peers as one of the dirtiest players in the game.
Points to me. Enjoy your imaginary points.
Here’s Tootoo’s MO, versus Staubitz:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYEyQowWG7o
The quick punch that is his calling card.
I see why you support him getting in the first shot, before the guy is ready. Its gutless, and it helps prevent getting his ass handed to him (say, when Staubitz cleaned his clock in SJ).
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 30, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I think that referees should be taught to look at the actions of the check not the amount of time the player who took the hit is on the ground. Has it occurred to anyone that the guy is staying on the ground or feigning pain to cause the penalty to be called? There was a story of a baseball player in the early rounds of this years play offs that faked being in pain as if he had been hit by the pitch to change the outcome of his game. There was no evidence one way or another so nothing was done. The refs are suppose to trust their own eyes on the play not second guess themselves. That is what instant replay and video reviews are for.
With these new rules...
…. that is going to be the call on that type of blindside hit from here on out.
The key part of that rule though...
… is that it has to be shot to the head. It’s a clean shoulder to shoulder hit.
Christie kicks it high and short...Gonna be fielded by Lorenzo Neal at the 25...He dishes it back to Wycheck...He throws it across the field to Dyson...
www.manningface.com
by Michaeltastic on Oct 29, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m not really upset with the charging call, because it did look pretty reckless at full speed. But if there’s any supplemental on this I will be livid.
Hard to fault the refs
Real time, hard hit, looked high (was shoulder to shoulder), caused injury. And it was Tootoo, a guy who has a rep for playing on the edge, known for dishing out borderline hits.
In a 2-0 game, late in the 3rd, that was decided already, no problem with a 2 min or even 5 min call (which is auto game misconduct). No harm done. So long as there is no supplemental fines or games missed for Toots.
Also: Tootoo Nancy-ed up, again. 2-0 game, late, Blue on the ice, being challenged by two guys, Strachan and ?……Last time out, toots was challenged, too, and at least decked a guy before he had his gloves off. I guess the Blues last night made the mistake of showing they were ready for a fight. That’s not Tootoo’s game.
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions
I was about to forget about your loss “prediction” and compliment your earlier posts in this thread, but if you are “not really upset with the charging call” you are back in my doghouse. Damn Burton, I am trying to like you…
Haha. Almost positive I saw you last night up near 311/312, btw – at least, I’m not sure how many people have a Preds “Cisar” jersey.
by Chris Burton on Oct 29, 2010 1:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I have never seen another Cisar jersey, other than the one Cisar himself was wearing. I am in Row A, 309. I have had the same seats since day one. If you see me, stop me and say hey. I think I have the largest collection of NHL Cisar memorabilia, including the stick with which he scored the first-ever Predators goal at an exhibition game in Alabama. I was at the game and decided to start screaming his name and he responded with a goal. That is why I have Marian Cisar’s name on my jersey. He is also the first Nashville Predator.
by cisar on Oct 29, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Taking the rooting interest out of it, I don't think it's a very clear play either way.
It was definitely a blind side hit and he left his feet (being short isn’t a defense because when Pronger elbows people, they don’t say “well the guy’s head is at his elbow level anyway”). I don’t know if you can definitively say he did or didn’t hit Colaiacovo in the head or not. If he didn’t, why did he look like he was slumping on the way to the ice? Why was he down and dazed? His shoulder may have grazed him.
And for the record, I don’t think he should be suspended.
My question for the residents of Smashville around here, do you support the way Tootoo plays? Do you like him as a player? I like strong physical play. I don’t like intent to injure.
www.stlouisgametime.com
In short, yes. I support the way Tootoo plays. He’s not a malicious player like Matt Cooke or Alex Burrows, he just plays hard, and sometimes goes too far in his enthusiasm. The guy is incredibly tough, and really won’t take crap from anyone. I wish he wouldn’t throw him self around recklessly all the time, because people start to think he’s “dirty”.
Essentially, he’s a game changing hitter and agitator who has one or two unfortunate incidents where he did do the wrong thing (Robidas!), and now has a target on his back. When he reins in his emotions, though, he’s one of the most effective agitators in the league. It’s unfortunate Cola got hurt, but I really don’t see the horror in the hit.
by Chris Burton on Oct 29, 2010 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions
Disagree
He is exactly Coojke and Burrows. He runs around, charges, leaves his feet, hits late, sucker punches, hits high, hits late. And, like the other two pests, when challenged he doesn’t answer the bell, like last night, and is only selectively brave.
But generally, most Preds fans are blind to his antics. Like Pittsburgh fans back up Cooke, or Nucks fans support Burrows.
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions
The moral of the story
If this helps to stoke the fires of a Nashville-St. Louis rivalry, cool. Would love some more spark to these matchups.
www.stlouisgametime.com
yeah
I’ve attended the first two STL-NSH games this year, and they’ve been really nasty. The Blues do a lot of extra-curricular activity before and after the whistle, and now Tootoo has gotten himself into trouble twice. I have to think payback awaits down the road in one form or another. Mark 11/24 on your calendars.
I’ve always thought STL/NSH should be a better rivalry because of the geographical proximity and how hard both teams play every night.
by Chris Burton on Oct 29, 2010 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions
confused
It was a shoulder to shoulder hit. So does it being a blindside hit even matter? The anouncers reference the new rule, which is about head shots, but is there a new one about blindside hits period?
"It's gonna be fun on the bun."
by flyalder on Oct 29, 2010 10:45 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
No...
The point of emphasis was specifically on blindside hits to the head. This doesn’t qualify. He was ejected for charging.
The league specifically put out a long video to all 30 teams and the officials this year full of examples and clearly stated that blindside hits that do not target the head are perfectly legal.
Predators Hockey: Live it, Love it...
Follow me on Twitter: @SLakePreds
by Seth Lake on Oct 29, 2010 10:52 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You should read the Blues SB Nation Board
http://www.stlouisgametime.com/2010/10/28/1781016/blues-win-in-nashville-tootoo-still-garbage
So much name calling and bafoonery. I’ve been having some fun with them.
My 2 cents:
1.The blindside/headshot rule: The rule that the announcers bring up has absolutely no bearing in this instance. It was not a blindside hit. It was not a shot to the head. Not only did Tootoo hit him in the shoulder(not the head), he hit him in the front of the shoulder. If you look at the 1:45 mark of the video and go through those couple of frames, you can see Colaiacovo full face. Just because he turns his head at the last second or his head is turned as a result of the hit doesn’t mean that he was blindsided. Don’t agree with that? Well here’s something else. Watch the direction that Colaiacovo is skating. If it’s a blindside hit, why can I see his face and his crotch?
2. Charging: As many have mentioned above, Tootoo doesn’t take one stride from the top of the circles. If he had any intent to injure, Tootoo would have been skating right up to the hit. Now I’ve seen several people say he left his feet. Please pause the frame where you see this and post it. Sure he ends up in the air, but it’s after the hit. That’s just physics, people. Tootoo is small guy, and when he collides with somebody bigger than him, he’s going to get launched in some direction.
3. The imposed penalties: In real time, I can see where the officials might have seen charging. I don’t agree, but I can understand. Now the major penalty: I think they just saw that it was Tootoo and called that one. When you make a call like that, though, you know in your head that it’s a borderline call. If you’re going to enforce that strong of a penalty, you need to lean towards the penalty on both sides. Where was the roughing call on Strachan? J.P. Dumont got a BS roughing call earlier in the game after takingg an unwarranted cheap shot. Strachan took his gloves off and started fighting. That should be an automatic penalty. Period.
4. Suspension?: It’s all in the video, folks.
Christie kicks it high and short...Gonna be fielded by Lorenzo Neal at the 25...He dishes it back to Wycheck...He throws it across the field to Dyson...
www.manningface.com
I don't think anyone is arguing for
suspension. But. like Burton mentioned above (though clearly many disagree),
you can’t blame the refs calling a penalty on a high, hard hit that looked to cause injury (Carlo looked dazed, so by a guy with a rep. The 5 minute call was wrong, but the game was over, the way the Preds were playing. It didn’t decide anything, and nothing more will come of it, when the League reviews it.
This is like griping of Duncan Keith spraying a water bottle at a glass partition. There were bigger criminal events (Erat blind backhand pass) to worry about then, as in now (Erat being useless).
by DontfeedtheBelak on Oct 29, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I think my main point here is
that the hit wasn’t dirty. It was just violent. Clean and violent. And I’m still clueless as to how the Blues weren’t given a penalty.
But other than that- yeah. This really had no effect on the game as we were being out-everythinged all night. We have bigger Erat’s I mean issues to worry about.
Christie kicks it high and short...Gonna be fielded by Lorenzo Neal at the 25...He dishes it back to Wycheck...He throws it across the field to Dyson...
www.manningface.com
by Michaeltastic on Oct 29, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Tootoo "Charge"
I am a huge Blues fan. Always have been, always will be. I still don’t believe Tootoo’s “charge” should have even drawn a penalty. They were both going for the puck. This is hockey isn’t it? LET THEM PLAY!
by Matt Sayle on Oct 29, 2010 3:39 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Two for Tootoo
His name alone will get him at least 2 games.
EASports' NHL 11 doesn't suck; in fact, it's really damn good! Wait, what!?
Go Predators!!!
1:54 of the video is the clearest image I saw...
Tootoo is already leaving his feet, before the hit, and his shoulder is lined up with Colaicovo’s head.
It’s charging as defined by rule, Rule 42.1 i believe, because he left his feet.
Being smaller than the player he hit is not an excuse.
It was charging, Tootoo targeted Colaicovo’s head, and then kept his gloves glued on when Strachan wanted him to answer the bell.
There will be a suspension, and it’s deserved. It probably won’t be for more than one game, maybe two, but a suspension is warranted.
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://futurenotes.blogspot.com
by Tomorrows Blues on Oct 29, 2010 8:23 PM EDT reply actions
There is no suspension coming
The league did not contact the Predators or Tootoo today. Tootoo is with the team in Detroit and eligible to play tomorrow night.
Overwhelming opinion on HFBoards, YouTube commentary, and Twitter is in support of Tootoo. He did not leave his feet before contact. As a matter of fact, his right foot never leaves the ice and his left only by a couple inches as a result of the position of Colaiacovo’s left leg.
Sorry to disappoint. This was a clean hit…
Predators Hockey: Live it, Love it...
Follow me on Twitter: @SLakePreds
by Seth Lake on Oct 29, 2010 8:38 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
You know we can all see the video right? No, he’s not leaving his feet BEFORE the hit. No his shoulder is NOT lined up with the head. Clean hit. Bad call. Strachan IS guilty of a) roughing, (gloved left to Tootoo’s face), and unsportsmanlike, (dropped gloves). Tootoo’s rep earned that call and his rep is out of date. For the last 2 or 3 seasons Tootoo has changed his style and as a result he has drawn penalties from players who are dumb enough to think he hasn’t.
I understand the favoritism towards Tootoo being shown here, guys...
…and if he was a Blue, I’d probably be doing the same thing.
But it’s clear from the ice-level shots that both of Tootoo’s skates are off the ground, and clear from the shot referenced above that this occurs prior to contact with Colaiacovo.
It’s commendable that you’re standing up for your player, but your player was in the wrong.
I do agree, however, that Strachan should have gotten at least a roughing penalty for dropping the gloves. It’s just too bad that Tootoo didn’t have the integrity to settle matters himself, right then and there, on the ice, like Gordie Howe or Ted Lindsay or any of the other greats from back in the day would have done.
At that point, he should have known he was getting a penalty regardless, so thus fails the notion that he was trying to avoid putting his team shorthanded by failing to drop ’em with Strachan.
Tootoo started the “S-H,” but didn’t have the integrity to back “I-T” up, and that’s unfortunate. I guarantee you, he’d be getting a little more respect over our way right now if he’d have at least taken his lumps like a man.
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://futurenotes.blogspot.com
by Tomorrows Blues on Oct 30, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Reply fail...
and if Tootoo was a Blue, I’d probably be doing the same.
But it’s clear from the ice-level shots that both of Tootoo’s skates are off the ice, and clear from the shot referenced above that this occurs prior to contact with Colaiacov, who did have his head and and who was looking in Tootoo’s direction.
I grant that Tootoo did not take a stride once inside the line formed by the faceoff dots… but the charging call comes from the fact that he left his feet, which can’t be denied from watching the video.
It’s commendable that you’re standing up for your player, but your player was in the wrong.
I do agree, however, that Strachan should have gotten at least a roughing penalty for dropping the gloves there. It’s unfortunate that Tootto didn’t have the integrity to do the same and settle the issue, right then and there, on the ice, like Gordie Howe or ted Lindsay or any of the other greats from back in the day would have done.
And please don’t try to claim that “Tootoo was trying to avoid putting his team shorthanded,” because at the point where Strachan’s challenging him, Tootoo knew (or should have known) that he was getting a penalty of some kind out of this.
Bottom line is that Tootoo made a questionable hit on a player in a vulnerable position, and that he didn’t have the courage to take his lumps like a man in the aftermath of the hit. I guarantee his reputation was involved in the call; that’s the price you pay for a legacy of questionable hits. And I also guarantee that Tootoo would be getting a little more respect on our side of the fence if he hadn’t kept his gloves glued on, and had answered the bell with Strachan.
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://futurenotes.blogspot.com
by Tomorrows Blues on Oct 30, 2010 3:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Sorry for the typos... no "edit" feature...
"If we do not prepare for ourselves the role of the hammer, there will be nothing left but that of the anvil."
-- Otto von Bismarck, 1851
http://futurenotes.blogspot.com
by Tomorrows Blues on Oct 30, 2010 3:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Wasn't a blind-side hit, wasn't charging, Colaiacovo...
should have had his head up! Hitting IS a part of this game, I assure you! He wasn’t charging because he was gliding towards the puck! The dude is just fast!! And if a player is facing the player who hits him, it doesn’t qualify as a blind side hit. I’m sorry if Colaiacovo wasn’t ready for the hit but STAY ALERT! If he had been ready for the hit he wouldn’t have been in bad shape.
It’s amazing that our player Marcel Goc who has been sidelined for about 2 weeks and still has a couple to heal and the player who did it to him got ONLY A 2 MINUTE MINOR AND NO SUSPENSION. Yet we are talking about a player who isn’t really that badly hurt but we are talking about a suspension for something that is a borderline no call is simply ridiculous.

by 
























