Strength of schedule could make or break NHL teams' playoff hopes
In the chase for the playoffs, some NHL teams have a harder road to travel than others, and as we flip the calendar over to February, the Dallas Stars, St. Louis Blues and Calgary Flames will face the stiffest opposition during the rest of the regular season. Over in the Eastern Conference, the rich are likely to get richer as the current division leaders, Washington, New Jersey, and Buffalo, all face relatively easy remaining schedules.
Follow after the jump for the complete breakdown...
The following table shows the remaining games for each NHL team starting with tonight, February 1, along with the average Points Percentage and Goals For/Against ratio in 5-on-5 play for their opponents, as an indicator of schedule strength. We also have the number of times that each team has to play games on consecutive nights, using the NHL Super Schedule which I published last summer. Home and road totals are included last.
For the sake of context, the average NHL team has a .559 Points Percentage (thanks to the OTL point, most teams are above .500), which translates to a 91-point season across 82 games. When teams play after having played the night before (the 2nd half of a Back-To-Back Set), their Points Percentage typically dips significantly. Last season, such teams had a .500 Pts %, as opposed to .557 overall.
Interestingly, the Dallas Stars will face the toughest opposition, but have the fewest Back-To-Backs remaining. Obviously, the presence of Western Conference teams at the top of this list is due to them having to mostly play each other - the West is dominating the East this season, with an average Pts % of .573 to .545 (and yet the East has more Overtime Losses, which makes even that comparison look closer than it should be).
| Team | Games | Average Opp Pt % | Avg Opp 5 on 5 GF/GA | Back-To-Back Sets | Home | Road |
| Dallas Stars | 27 | .602 | 1.08 | 2 | 14 | 13 |
| Columbus Blue Jackets | 25 | .598 | 1.08 | 3 | 15 | 10 |
| St. Louis Blues | 27 | .583 | 1.04 | 7 | 13 | 14 |
| Calgary Flames | 27 | .581 | 1.06 | 3 | 13 | 14 |
| Colorado Avalanche | 28 | .572 | 1.04 | 6 | 16 | 12 |
| Carolina Hurricanes | 28 | .572 | 1.03 | 5 | 13 | 15 |
| Nashville Predators | 28 | .572 | 1.02 | 5 | 15 | 13 |
| Detroit Red Wings | 27 | .572 | 1.04 | 4 | 14 | 13 |
| Vancouver Canucks | 28 | .570 | 1.00 | 6 | 10 | 18 |
| New York Rangers | 26 | .569 | 1.03 | 4 | 12 | 14 |
| Phoenix Coyotes | 26 | .569 | 1.05 | 6 | 10 | 16 |
| Edmonton Oilers | 29 | .564 | 1.01 | 6 | 12 | 17 |
| Florida Panthers | 27 | .560 | 1.02 | 6 | 15 | 12 |
| New York Islanders | 26 | .556 | 1.00 | 6 | 15 | 11 |
| Atlanta Thrashers | 28 | .556 | 1.04 | 7 | 16 | 12 |
| Boston Bruins | 29 | .556 | 1.03 | 5 | 12 | 17 |
| Tampa Bay Lightning | 28 | .555 | 1.04 | 5 | 15 | 13 |
| Chicago Blackhawks | 27 | .555 | 0.99 | 7 | 14 | 13 |
| Anaheim Ducks | 27 | .555 | 1.01 | 6 | 15 | 12 |
| Minnesota Wild | 27 | .555 | 1.03 | 4 | 15 | 12 |
| San Jose Sharks | 27 | .554 | 1.01 | 4 | 11 | 16 |
| Pittsburgh Penguins | 26 | .553 | 1.01 | 7 | 14 | 12 |
| Los Angeles Kings | 27 | .550 | 0.99 | 3 | 16 | 11 |
| Toronto Maple Leafs | 26 | .549 | 0.96 | 5 | 15 | 11 |
| Montreal Canadiens | 26 | .545 | 1.01 | 5 | 14 | 12 |
| Philadelphia Flyers | 29 | .539 | 0.96 | 6 | 12 | 17 |
| Ottawa Senators | 26 | .537 | 1.03 | 4 | 10 | 16 |
| Buffalo Sabres | 29 | .537 | 0.96 | 7 | 13 | 16 |
| Washington Capitals | 27 | .534 | 0.95 | 5 | 14 | 13 |
| New Jersey Devils | 28 | .520 | 0.97 | 7 | 14 | 14 |
This strength-of-schedule could have a net impact of a 2-4 points or so down the stretch (for example: 27 games, 2 points per game available, and a difference of .050 = 2.7 total points). Given the incredibly tight competition in the Eastern Conference, where positions 6-12 are separated by a mere two points, that's definitely enough to make or break a few teams' playoff hopes.
How will this impact your favorite team?
3 recs |
8 comments
|
Comments
Wow
When I first saw this list I thought you listed the Western and Eastern Conference separately.
great work.
The New Improved Avalanche. Now with Real Coaches!
Jibblescribbits: C'mon over and waste some time
Why not list the average winning percentages of the opponents remaining on the schedule? That stat changes this list significantly. Just listing one offensive category, no defensive stats and no winning percentage doesn’t accurately convey the difficulty of the remaining schedules. The Preds were said to have one of the easiest schedules in the second half. That’s not quite what this chart says.
The Avg Opp 5-on-5 GF/GA measures the balance of both offense and defense.
Give me a few minutes and I’ll take a look at Winning Percentage instead of Points Percentage to see if it makes a significant difference (or do you already know that it does?).
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
FYI, I ran the numbers using Winning Percentage rather than Points Percentage and it didn’t change things much. Top 4 teams stayed exactly the same, Bottom 6 are the same teams although Ottawa moves from 4th-easiest to 2nd.
The Preds slip down one spot using that measure.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
Back-To-Back Sets
Lots of Back to Back games still ahead for most teams. You can blame the Olympics. Thats what happens when you get an 18 game break. Teams are going to have to be in shape to make a late season run, after an 18 game rest.
Judging by the relatively "easier" strength of schedule
For the first time ever, I’ll be looking forward to that annual Maple Leafs run to 10th place in the East this season. We need this, Boston.
Supporter of the Sergei Berezin "Give and Go" - You give me puck, then you go to hell

by 



















