Nashville Predators approaching key attendance goal, but NHL revenue sharing still at risk
In the latest update on the average paid attendance figures for the Nashville Predators, John Glennon reports that after 29 home games, the Preds now stand at 13,793 (up from 13,511 about a month ago).
Somebody make sure these figures get to "Rusty" Lawrence ahead of tomorrow's meeting of the Sports Authority, okay?
The Preds are currently enjoying the typical post-football season boost to their ticket sales, and are making progress towards the critical 14,000 milestone which represents a pre-condition for receiving full NHL revenue sharing under the Collective Bargaining Agreement. One thing to keep in mind, however, is that hitting the 14K benchmark doesn't necessarily mean the team will qualify for full NHL revenue sharing, and they've still got plenty of work to do down the stretch...
The Predators continue their home schedule after the Olympic break with 10 home games in the month of March. For discount tickets to any Nashville Predators home game, follow this link and use the special offer code "PREDS".
What's At Stake
Nashville's ability to meet these conditions is often seen as putting the team at risk of not receiving upwards of $10 million in NHL revenue sharing if they miss the target. Since a total loss of $20 million, combined with paid attendance below 14,000, can trigger an escape of the arena lease, this causes some observers to surmise that the Predators could move out of town as soon as this summer. A critical point that is often misunderstood, however, is that under the CBA, a team that misses the performance targets would only lose 25% of their share, so the stakes involved are more like $2-4 million. Since the team has come close to breaking even the last two seasons, and has kept payroll low this year, it remains absurdly unlikely that the $20 million net loss figure is on the horizon.
So forget the relocation talk, and focus on what's really on the line: somewhere in the neighborhood of $2-4 million in revenue sharing.
The Good News
As noted above, paid attendance is on the rise, and if they merely average 14,500 the rest of the way, the Preds will hit the 14K mark. Their last 5 home games have averaged 15,146, and with a playoff drive coming up which includes a heavy dose of Thursday/Saturday games, all signs are positive that they'll achieve that goal.
If the team averages 15,146 the rest of the way (as they have over the last home stand), they'll end up with the same overall total as last season (14,190). So there's also a chance they could make year-over-year progress in terms of tickets sold.
The Bad News
There is another criterion that must be met for a team to receive a full portion of revenue sharing, however. This comes from Article 49 of the CBA:
The Club is generating a year-to-year revenue growth rate in excess of the League average revenue growth rate (i.e., the Club's revenue growth rate from the previous League Year to the current League Year is greater than the League average revenue growth rate from the previous League Year to the current League Year);
In short, the team's revenue growth rate has to exceed the league average, and this is where the Predators could run into trouble. All indications so far is that the League's average revenue growth will be pretty flat, balancing out the general economic situation against the runup in the Canadian dollar (since all revenues are measured in USD, appreciation of the Loonie directly inflates the revenue of the Canadian teams as expressed in league figures, and thus the NHL as a whole).
Based on detailed information that I requested from the Metro Sports Authority that covers the first 23 home games, however, it appears that both gross and net sales (before and after ticket-based taxes paid to the city of Nashville) resulting from these paid attendance figures are running about 10% lower than last season, which could, if continued, result in a drop of $2-3 million in ticket sales. Whether this is the result of discounting, or a change in the mix of tickets being sold (lower vs. upper bowl) is impossible to say.
It should also be noted that there are other revenue streams that could theoretically make up for this gap; corporate sponsorships, stronger ticket sales in the coming weeks, etc. But the likelihood is that top-line revenue dollars during the regular season will decline from last season, putting the team at risk of missing the aforementioned 25% of NHL revenue sharing.
The Road Ahead
So if the Predators are in danger of bringing in $2-3 million less at the gate, and could miss out on a further $2-4 million in revenue sharing, are they doomed financially?
Hardly.
As mentioned previously, other revenue streams could help alleviate the ticket-selling shortfall, and the rumored upcoming partnership with Bridgestone could present a major step along that road.
A single playoff round (3 home games) would also close most or all of that financial gap, and anything further would not just push this season's figures into the black, but also build momentum for next year with both individual and corporate sales. The playoffs are a major profit generator for NHL teams, because player salaries have already been paid out over the course of the regular season, while gate revenues are typically very high as teams sellout the games at what are often premium prices.
As always, it comes down to the Stanley Cup playoffs. Making them, and making noise once they get there, is of critical importance to the Nashville Predators and their fans.
The Nashville Predators reviewed this article prior to publication and declined to confirm or deny the details presented above.
12 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Job!
Maybe you could hold a seminar for the business writers at the Tennessean on how to write a fair article based on facts and not rampant speculation from someone who doesn’t understand the process.
by Preds On The Glass on Feb 11, 2010 4:10 PM EST reply actions
Excellent Work
Dirk, that’s a really good piece presenting an overview from all sides.
by David Singleton on Feb 11, 2010 5:07 PM EST reply actions
Fantastic Piece!
Dirk,
That is probably the best written piece I have seen on this subject. Could you please give it to the Tennessean now so they would have a CLUE!
dig deeper
Based on detailed information that I requested from the Metro Sports Authority that covers the first 23 home games, however, it appears that both gross and net sales resulting from these paid attendance figures are running about 10% lower than last season
Compared to the per-game average through mid-Feb of last year?
Fewer games last year during that time means higher per-game expectations
Compared to the total through mid-Feb last year?
Last year’s schedule was lighter in the fall/early winter
Compared to the per-game average of all last year?
Obviously the Preds revenue and attendance numbers historically climb late in the season
Need more data.
Blog- http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul
Hockey Pics- http://flickr.com/photos/paulnich/collections/72157600076075216/
Hockey Vids- http://vimeo.com/pwnicholson/videos/tag:nhl
Good story though
All-in-all a good piece. Just curious to see how that revenue growth piece really matches up to last years comparable data.
Blog- http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul
Hockey Pics- http://flickr.com/photos/paulnich/collections/72157600076075216/
Hockey Vids- http://vimeo.com/pwnicholson/videos/tag:nhl
To clarify, the drop is in the sales price per ticket sold, through the first 23 home games of this and last season. It’s a pricing decline.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
by Dirk Hoag on Feb 11, 2010 6:44 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
That does clarify the number quoted. I didn’t understand the number you referenced as “gross and net sales resulting from these paid attendance figures” to just be avg revenue per ticket.
Firstly, if both gross (ticket sale price x number of tickets) and net revenues (gross – costs)(aka: profit) are down 10%, it means that costs are declining at the same rate as ticket revenues. That’s a fairly good thing from a business point of view. I would have expected that there were a large amount of fixed costs associated with putting on a game, regardless of how many butts are in seats or where the seats were (salaries, electric bill, etc), so if gross sales went down 10%, I would expect net revenues (profit) to go down at a greater than 10% rate. The fact that they are doing down in tandem means the Preds are doing a good job of keeping costs associated with the games under control.
Second, the fact that the numbers are for the first 23 home games of the year, this year vs last, is yet another good-guy from the way I see it. 23 home games last year was Jan 19th while 23 home games this year was already up by Jan 9th. Bigger still, last year had a fairly even spacing of games (easier to sell) while this year’s almost half of the first 23 home games (10) were crammed in the space of just 2 weeks – a very difficult sell. I would expect those games to draw more of the average fan with cheaper season tickets in the upper deck. The more spaced out games are the higher percentage of them can be filled by those casual rich fans that fill those lower bowl games only once a week (on weekends out, etc.)
It’s also worth pointing out that the revenue figures are based on the first 23 games while the attendance figures are based on 29 games. I would expect that these last five games (which have averaged 1300+ more in paid attendance each) will have an even higher revenue per ticket number than the lower attendance games.
I think we’re drawing the same conclusion, I was just looking at the numbers from a slightly different angle.
Blog- http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul
Hockey Pics- http://flickr.com/photos/paulnich/collections/72157600076075216/
Hockey Vids- http://vimeo.com/pwnicholson/videos/tag:nhl
correction
the game crunch in Nov was 8 games in 2 weeks, not 10. Still something I know the ticket sales guys were worried about.
In contrast, the most packed the schedule got last year was 6 games in 2 weeks. Makes a big difference, especially in the heart football season.
They also have another tight schedule in March where they have 7 home games in 2 weeks, but since that will be away from the football competition (though during March Madness) hopefully it won’t hurt the numbers too bad.
Blog- http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul
Hockey Pics- http://flickr.com/photos/paulnich/collections/72157600076075216/
Hockey Vids- http://vimeo.com/pwnicholson/videos/tag:nhl
Another good point for me to clarify; “gross” and “net” refer to ticket revenue before and after ticket-based taxes paid to the city. It does not mean net of business costs.
I’ll include that distinction in updated text above.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
by Dirk Hoag on Feb 11, 2010 10:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Certainly, when you get closer to sellout numbers, the average revenue per ticket does go up a bit (since more of the lower-bowl seats get sold), but that effect was seen last season as well down the stretch, so I doubt that year-over-year comparisons will change much there.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.
Attendance
Tampa Bay has taken advance revenue share to make January payroll and Phoenix has advanced revenue share dollars too. Neither one should qualify based on criteria!
Why are the Preds always the focus if other teams are allowed to receive a pass?
Geeze Louise!
Methinks Paul Nicholson did almost as much research on his comments as Dirk did on the story! LOL
Nice job outta the both ’a yas!
:)

by 






















