What FIFA and the World Cup could learn from hockey
As an American sports fan, I've wanted to jump on the World Cup bandwagon, but I'll be blunt - it's hard to take a sport seriously which features such consistently incompetent officiating in its hallmark event, along with players who flop to the turf several times a game, faking injury to draw calls or stall the action. Just in the last few days, we saw England's tying goal against Germany overlooked despite crossing the line by two feet, and numerous offsides situations which have been missed, only to lead to critical goals being scored.
In the US, the natural cry is for FIFA to catch up with other professional sports organizations and utilize video review to one degree or another. In every sport this move was initially met with furious opposition, only to be embraced over time as fans, players and coaches alike realized that a small delay (and it needs to be kept small) is an acceptable price to pay in order to "get it right".
The thing is, there are some easy steps which FIFA can take to improve the officiating without having to resort to video review. While it wouldn't ensure that every error will get caught, soccer could do well to take two lessons from the world of hockey...
Goal Judges
Photo courtesy of s.yume on Flickr.
Until the NHL committed to extensive use of video replay, this was my plan to spend a comfortable retirement. You put someone in a designated spot whose sole job is to make Goal/No Goal determinations, and turn on the red light as needed. While not as reliable as video review, a goal judge generally has a much better viewpoint than the current referee who has to jog up and down the field while keeping track of the general flow of the game.
Goal judges are no longer found around the NHL, having been made obsolete by the video War Room in Toronto, which reviews every goal scored in every game. They worked pretty well for decades, however, and would be a ridiculously easy way for FIFA to improve its goal/no goal calls.
As for the "War Room"... as you can see in the video below, it's a great example of a league doing its best to make correct calls. They're not perfect, but darn close. Soccer won't get to this point for a while, but it's something they should aim for. In the meantime, however, find a couple old codgers and set them up as Goal Judges.
Two Referees
Starting with the 2000-2001 season, all NHL games have been conducted with a two-referee, two-linesman setup which has greatly increased the ability of officials to catch fouls behind the play. All too often, as a puck carrier came through the neutral zone, opposing defenders would hook, hold, and otherwise obstruct attackers trying to join the rush.
In soccer, the field is just too large and there are too many players for a single referee to keep track of. Just as it took time for the NHL to phase in the use of a two-referee system, FIFA could get started on that process, which involves somewhat of an evolution to define the on-field boundaries and operational practices. There is also the matter of developing referees at the lower levels, and the NHL is just now pushing to utilize this setup in the AHL, the primary minor league in North America.
The bottom line, however, is that nobody in NHL could envision going back to a one-referee system, and I'd bet the same would take place in the world of international soccer after a few years. Sure, there's an initial period of flux during which additional calls get made and players learn to adapt to having an extra set of eyes watching them, but ultimately that's in the best interest of the game.
The World Is Watching
Frankly, FIFA should be embarrassed by the number of times that officiating has overshadowed the competition at this 2010 World Cup. Instead of complaining about the critics, however, their leadership needs to do something to ensure that what is touted as the World's Greatest Sporting Event actually looks like it, rather than professional wrestling on turf.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
1 more
You forgot the change that needs to be made the most: Get the clock issues straight. Get a real clock with a fixed amount of time. Have each stoppage event automatically tag a very specific amount of time on to the game, no more no less. The refs would be responsible for simply indicating “this is a 15 second stoppage”, "this is a “5 second stoppage”, etc. Have that time display on the scoreboard so that players and fans alike know exactly how much time is left to attempt that last mad rush to tie a 1 goal game. Right now this is far too gray an area that leads to anticlimactic endings and feels like it gives the refs far too much subjective control on the game. Would also help since players and teams would then be forced to carry out their shenanigans in a very specific amount of time. No more lolly-gagging onto the field for a substitution. You have 30 seconds. Get it done. Injury time could be determined by the ref, but would be announced at the time, added to the clock, and clear for all to see.
If not, god forbid, allow the ref to just stop the clock and restart it using their whistles (like NBA/NFL refs)
Blog- http://nicholsonrecords.com/paul
Hockey Pics- http://flickr.com/photos/paulnich/collections/72157600076075216/
Hockey Vids- http://vimeo.com/pwnicholson/videos/tag:nhl
Agree
I hate stoppage time. It’s so open to corruption. Someone did a little homework and figured out that Manchester United routinely played in more stoppage time when they were behind and less when they were ahead. Coincidence?
I also think the offsides rule in soccer blows. Traditionalists will tell you that it prevents cherry picking. I say so does a defender. Either that or make another line where, like hockey, if the player crosses it before the ball then it’s offsides. As far as I’m concerned if the offense gets behind the defense that’s the defense’s grief.
I’d change the substitution rules and I’d have a review of all yellow and red cards as well as injuries. (After the fact, of course) If it’s deemed in retrospect that a player faked an injury in order to get the opposing player a yellow/red card then the card would be removed and the player faking the injury would be suspended for 5 games.
And finally, any player going down and staying down for more than 10 seconds would be required to leave the pitch for the next 10 minutes. That would cut down on the flopping.
FIFA is equal – if not more – corrupt than the IOC. As if to suggest their officials could make an error I think is too much of an ego slam. But you’re right, it’s laughable that on such a huge, global stage that the World Cup has become they are comfortable with such blatant errors that can alter the matches.
'Nucks Misconduct - Housing Swedish Millionaires Since 2000.
I agree. Common Sense rules over incredibly dumb traditions every day of the week. There’s no reason why they cannot put two people on the field to call a game, and someone behind the goals. No reason.
A nice byproduct of this will be the officiating will become more uniform. You won’t have referees with particular styles determining how teams play and go about their gameplan.
EX: Julio doesn’t call as many diving tackle fouls as Francis does, but he issues more cards than everybody, except Sergei.
by ExcellenceThroughGuesswork on Jun 29, 2010 3:21 PM EDT reply actions
+1
I completely agree. The worst part is all of the diving. Get up an play the damn game. I sometimes think the diving in the NHL is bad. Then I watch a soccer game and my mind gets blown away. Can you imagine if players in the NHL dived like they do in soccer??? Unbelievable.
There are so many archaic rules in soccer.
I’m convinced all (more or less) of the aforementioned complaints are the reason, relatively speaking, nobody in the US and Canada cares about soccer.
I agree that there needs to be more in the way of officiating at the World Cup. As you said, the world is watching, and every decision from the referees is going to be brutally analyzed.
and FYI: The picture of the German player offsides is slightly incorrect. The player is in an offsides position, but he has no involvement in the play as the ball is passed to the player below him (in fact the circled player doesn’t touch the ball at all in the build-up to the goal). A player is allowed to be offsides as long as he doesn’t receive the ball while in an offsides postition. A better example would of Carlos Tevez’s goal against Mexico the other day (now he was clearly offsides)
Thanks for the correction
I know there have been several blown offsides calls, that was the only one I could easily find a picture for. If I can find a replacement, I’ll pop it in.
More fun than a stick to the face!
On the Forecheck is SB Nation's blog covering the Nashville Predators.

by 























