Teemu Laakso 2011-2012 Season Preview - Patience rewarded?
Teemu Laakso has toiled in the Nashville Predators organization for three full seasons, often coming tantalizingly close to earning steady NHL work only to head back to Milwaukee for more development. This year, he breaks camp with the Preds for the second time, with perhaps his best chance at a regular spot in the lineup.
Is this the year that Teemu Laakso becomes a full-time NHLer? Let's find out after the jump...
2010-2011 Recap
Laakso pretty much wore a track from Nashville to Milwaukee, making the trip back and forth several times over the course of the season, serving as an emergency option on defense but ultimately only playing one game in the NHL, on October 23rd at Dallas, with a whopping 2:43 of ice time.
During his time in Milwaukee, however, he played a leading role As our friends at Admirals Roundtable said in their season review:
Best Lineup Decision: Pairing Roman Josi and Teemu Laakso on the blueline. The two European-born defenders were dynamite as a tandem against Texas, and a big reason why Milwaukee advanced to the second round. The two combined for a plus 13 rating in a series decided by a razor thin margin.
Given the other high-flying blueline prospects within the system, such as Mattias Ekholm and Ryan Ellis, it makes one wonder if Laakso might prove to be an ideal complement to those kinds of players, the safety net which allows the high-profile guy to take chances offensively.
Milestones Within Reach
With just 8 career NHL games, pretty each every night will be a milestone.
Advanced Stats (5-on-5)
With so little NHL experience, there's really nothing to offer from an advanced stats perspective here. One could use the concept of NHL Equivalency to guesstimate that as a 24-year-old coming from the AHL, we can expect him to produce at a points-per-game rate around 33% of what he did last year for Milwaukee. With the Admirals, he put up 8 goals and 22 assists in 74 games, for a 0.40 PPG. Translate that to around 0.13 PPG in the NHL, and if Laakso were to play all 82 games, that would project him for around 10 or 11 points.
Shot Chart
Here's a look at where all of Laakso's Even Strength shots came from while he played for the Preds last season:
Oops, he didn't have any!
Blast From The Past
Here's my response back in 2009, to the question of whether going with rookies in Laakso, Cody Franson and Alexander Sulzer would be a "stretch" for the Preds:
My answer, yes, it would be a stretch - a mind-blowingly large one that would probably send Barry Trotz's blood pressure through the roof. I simply can't imagine an NHL team with aspirations for the playoffs lining up 3 totally raw rookies in the 5-6-7 slots, behind Kevin Klein (with all of 81 games of NHL experience) at #4. For the sake of his head coach's sanity, David Poile will obtain a graybeard, stay-at-home type to work the 3rd pair and mentor the new kids. It's a formula that worked well with Greg de Vries, and now it's time to move on to a more affordable option. [note: Francis Bouillon joined the Preds during that training camp]
That matches pretty much exactly what I thought about the notion that Nashville would sport a 3rd-pairing that was "new to the NHL" this fall.
Video Highlight
With the Admirals, Laakso did seem to produce at a decent clip offensively, and here you see him blast one from the point:
Outlook For 2011-2012
The Positive: He earns the coaches' trust holding down a stay-at-home job on the 3rd pair and PK, playing the bulk of the season.
The Negative: Gets pushed out of the way by one of the prospects, and either gets traded or claimed on waivers to try and find an opportunity elsewhere.
13 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
This whole issue with all the youg guys(forwards and defensemen) makes me nervous. Is it that they are all good enough for a roster spot in the NHL (which would be a good thing)? Or is it because we aren’t good enough to have anyone they would have to replace?
Yes.
To both questions. They are good enough, look at Laakso and Hillen – both have NHL experience, and Laakso a long time in the AHL (think Blum here). The forwards: well Colin Wilson always had the talent but now comes the maturity and work ethic to become the player he can be. Craig Smith is 22, not 18. 22 is a typically a good age to enter the NHL. Will there be some mistakes? Sure. But if any coaching staff (and team leadership) can keep them focused, it’s this group.
I asked Leggy about that yesterday and this is what he said: “Davy sad”
60% of the time it works every time
by Creeping Death on Oct 5, 2011 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions 3 recs
We are young, but I like this team. This is not like the Ducks throwing an 18 year old into the fire because they had little choice, this is a seasoned group of guys who have played our system who happen to be young. The team chemistry is evident.
Trotz, who loves to juggle lines at times, should be giddy. The combos he can throw out there, if needed, is diverse. All my fears of a young 3rd pairing are disappearing. The young and new guys are capable players.
Let’s get this party started. C’mon friday, lets go test the new and improved Jackets and Blues.
Optimistic about Laakso
I think at the end of the season, people are going to be admitting that they didn’t give Laakso enough credit early on. I think he’s more defensively sound than Blum is, and certainly is a more physical customer in the corners. If he can stay healthy, I think this will be a solid year for Laakso.
wow!! Ryan Miller reads OtF!!!
60% of the time it works every time
by Creeping Death on Oct 5, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
It must be these homeric glasses I'm wearing
…but Laakso reminds me of that young defenseman the Predators brought up from Milwaukee five years ago for a midseason game against the Wings. Weber, I think his name was.
by Hockey Hillbilly on Oct 5, 2011 12:33 PM EDT reply actions
Maybe you’re right, Wardo. I only got a glimpse.
by Hockey Hillbilly on Oct 5, 2011 1:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Question
Are we showcasing Laakso until Ekhom fully takes his role or are we showcasing Hillen? It seems like Hillen and Laakso make a good pair: Laakso is stay at home dman and Hillen seems to be a little more agile and offensive. Or are we just gonna let one of them move up the ladder in case one of the Suter/Weber isn’t here next year or two?

by


























