NHL Realignment: Nashville Predators to retain rivalry with current Central teams
The NHL's Board of Governors today approved a league realignment to take effect next season which will feature four conferences instead of the current two-conference, three-division format, with the first two rounds of the playoffs taking place within these conferences.
Frankly, I'm thrilled at the prospects here. The current format has done nothing to foster division rivalries, and now there will be a genuine accomplishment to winning both a regular season and playoff division title.
After the jump, let's lay out the new alignment plan, and look at some of the implications for the Nashville Predators.
We'll go with the terms used by Kevin Allen of USA Today here. The following table lays out the new conferences, and I've calculated the average distance for each team to its new conference foes.
| Central Conference | Avg. Dist. | West Conference | Avg. Dist. |
| Chicago Blackhawks | 434 | Anaheim Ducks | 743 |
| Columbus Blue Jackets | 524 | Calgary Flames | 875 |
| Dallas Stars | 846 | Colorado Avalanche | 886 |
| Detroit Red Wings | 530 | Edmonton Oilers | 1008 |
| Minnesota Wild | 557 | Los Angeles Kings | 737 |
| Nashville Predators | 549 | Phoenix Coyotes | 812 |
| St. Louis Blues | 460 | San Jose Sharks | 745 |
| Winnipeg Jets | 863 | Vancouver Canucks | 895 |
| AVERAGE | 595 | AVERAGE | 838 |
| East 1 Conference | Avg. Dist. | East 2 Conference | Avg. Dist. |
| Boston Bruins | 637 | Carolina Hurricanes | 366 |
| Buffalo Sabres | 535 | New Jersey Devils | 173 |
| Florida Panthers | 1087 | New York Islanders | 191 |
| Montreal Canadiens | 617 | New York Rangers | 177 |
| Ottawa Senators | 576 | Philadelphia Flyers | 164 |
| Tampa Bay Lightning | 1013 | Pittsburgh Penguins | 289 |
| Toronto Maple Leafs | 553 | Washington Capitals | 195 |
| AVERAGE | 717 | AVERAGE | 222 |
The travel imbalances which have plagued the Western teams for years seem to be a little bit alleviated here, and I like the way the Western and Central conferences are grouped as much as possible within their time zones. As far as the total travel burden on each team works out, that will have to wait until the next season's schedule comes out, after which I'll publish another Super Schedule.
The cool news here? Teams will play every team outside their conference at least once home and away each season. More details can be found at our SB Nation Primer on NHL realignment.
For the Nashville Predators, the critical point here seems to be maintaining their rivalry with Detroit (and the pretty-much-guaranteed sellouts those bring), as well as more exposure to teams in the East. Every season, we'll be able to see the stars from all over the league come to Bridgestone Arena, which is an easier ticket to sell than "here come the Coyotes once again"!
The NHL's press release follows:
The National Hockey League Board of Governors tonight approved a four-Conference alignment format and authorized Commissioner Gary Bettman to implement this proposal, pending input from the National Hockey League Players' Association. The format would create two eight-team Conferences and two seven-team conferences.
Under the format, every team would play every other team outside its conference twice -- once home, once away.
In the seven-team Conferences, teams would play six times -- three home, three away. In the eight-team Conferences, teams would play either five or six times in a season on a rotating basis; three teams would play each other six times and four teams would play each other five times. This process would reverse each season: An eight-team Conference member that plays an opponent six times in one season would play it five times the following season.
The top four teams in each Conference qualify for the Stanley Cup Playoffs. The first-place team would play the fourth-place team; the second-place team would play the third-place team. The four respective Conference champions would meet in the third round of the Playoffs, with the survivors playing for the Stanley Cup.
The Conference format:
CONF. A CONF. B CONF. C CONF. D
Anaheim Chicago Boston Carolina
Calgary Columbus Buffalo NJ Devils
Colorado Dallas Florida NY Islanders
Edmonton Detroit Montreal NY Rangers
Los Angeles Minnesota Ottawa Philadelphia
Phoenix Nashville Tampa Bay Pittsburgh
San Jose St. Louis Toronto Washington
Vancouver Winnipeg
96 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Map of the NEW league:

Hands go uuppp..... AND THEY STAY THERE!
-nashvillepredators-
by davisca on Dec 5, 2011 10:17 PM EST reply actions 7 recs
Was this the HUGE project you were working on???
World Wide Weber.
There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
~Joe Strummer
No haha, but it looks pretty nice, eh? I’m pleased!
Hands go uuppp..... AND THEY STAY THERE!
-nashvillepredators-
Lady.
I have been doing map projections for like 3 weeks straight now. I LIKE it!
We'll miss you Belak...
Go Predators!
I think the idea is that there’s a closer rivalry within the “green” conference, so they kept them all together. TB and Florida are the other furthest east teams, so they fit in, I guess?
Hands go uuppp..... AND THEY STAY THERE!
-nashvillepredators-
Exactly! Old, retired fans gotta cheer for someone, too!
Hands go uuppp..... AND THEY STAY THERE!
-nashvillepredators-
If you are the Blue Jackets… Yeah.
World Wide Weber.
There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
~Joe Strummer
by cisar on Dec 5, 2011 10:22 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
haha!
60% of the time it works every time
by Creeping Death on Dec 5, 2011 10:23 PM EST up reply actions
I like the teams in our conference, good rivalries. I don’t like the whole structure of number of games and could care less about the home-and-home with every team in the league.
World Wide Weber.
There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
~Joe Strummer
with Columbus and Winnipeg in our conference, we have a 4 in 6 chance of making the playoffs!
60% of the time it works every time
by Creeping Death on Dec 5, 2011 10:24 PM EST up reply actions
Thanks Dirk!
Great work as always!
Support Coyotes Hockey - Five For Howling
(Oh, and go Philly teams as well!)
Perhaps Shinnyhan was waiting to see if we were going to be in Buffalo’s conference before the Toots ruling?
World Wide Weber.
There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
~Joe Strummer
sshhhhh! I think he was using this so he didn’t have to rule. smoke and mirrors
60% of the time it works every time
by Creeping Death on Dec 5, 2011 10:33 PM EST up reply actions
I do think that the realignment announcement played into the decision to not announce anything regarding Tootoo. I bet they wanted to let the realignment have the headlines for a while. But I also think Shanahan takes what the players have to say into account for interpreting the situation and whether additional discipline is required.
2 of my WORST fears coming true
I can live with the conference set ups, but the PO format SUCKS! You can have teams with more pts miss the playoffs by gtd top 4 of the conf. I can also go along with 1-4 meeting in the 1st round, but they should reseed for the 2nd round. I like playing new teams in the PO’s and NOT playing the same team(s) every year for the PO’s. We’re going to see the top teams in the league playing each other in the 2nd round almost every year with this format. I think they already know Phx is relocating and if they go to QC that will balance out the 2 of the Conf. Then we might see the top 8 in the East/West seeded. They Player Asso also expressed the same concerns and I hope they tweek this a little more after Bettmean meets with them.
I like the reseed after the first round idea.
World Wide Weber.
There is no tenderness or humanity in fanaticism.
~Joe Strummer
I don’t know…. reseeding got Herman Cain in trouble
60% of the time it works every time
by Creeping Death on Dec 5, 2011 10:43 PM EST up reply actions
Haaaah!
Nice. I don’t think the playoff structure is 100% yet, at least Dreger & McKenzie are making it sound that there is still work to be done on that front.
by Daniel Mills on Dec 5, 2011 10:46 PM EST up reply actions
Aren't the top teams supposed to play each other in the playoffs?
I mean… that’s the point, right?
I think I might be misunderstanding you slightly, but it seems to be a fine setup when you think of it as 4 conferences instead of divisions.
We'll miss you Belak...
Go Predators!
The top teams shouldn't meet in the 2nd round
Say Hawks/Wings or Pens/Caps have the most pts in the entire NHL, they HAVE to play each other in the 2nd round to advance. What fair about that? Also, if memory serves me correctly, a lot of Stanley Cups were blow outs and/or sweeps with this format before because the 2 best teams WERE NOT playing each other.
Agree completely with you. Memories of the Islanders and Oilers playing lighweights in the Cup finals go thru my head when I see this new realignment.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 5, 2011 11:27 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Well, look at the “Patrick” conference. Potentially as soon as next season you could have seven playoff-caliber teams there, but only four will make it. Even now, five of the seven look home-ice caliber or very close. So a really good team is going to miss out.
Red Line Station and @RedArmyLine, featuring coverage of the most frustrating team in the NHL
I believe in next year.
by red army line on Dec 5, 2011 11:20 PM EST up reply actions
if you can’t finish in the top half of your division, you don’t deserve to make it to the post season. whether that’s 2 points or 10 points. period. the old school playoff method was far superior to today’s because the regular season division games were so intense since so much was riding on it.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
Yes, but
if the 6 best teams in the league are all in one division, it will cancel themselves out.
Shocked that they did this.
While I’m not surprised we stayed in the western conference/whatever you call it now, I am shocked that they didn’t move both Detroit and Columbus over to the eastern conferences/whatever you call them and keep the times zones together. That’s one thing I could see changing at the end of this plan.
Besides Detroit and Columbus, Tampa, Florida and Winnipeg can’t be to happy with this either (would like to know which teams voted against this idea). I also don’t see how this heats up division rivalries more than they are now. It’s not like we would play Detroit or Chicago more often under this format.
Hoping the NHLPA puts the brakes on this, to be honest.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 5, 2011 11:24 PM EST via mobile reply actions
They’ve already expressed reservations about a plan like this. Will be interesting to see if they fight it.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 5, 2011 11:28 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
You really don’t know that now, do you?
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 5, 2011 11:38 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
well i’m glad you “hope” they’ll put the brakes on this, but there isn’t really anything they can do until collective bargaining is open.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
And that will be in before the next season starts I do believe. That would give them time then.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 5, 2011 11:47 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
well, I honestly don’t believe they can alter the division format. They may be able to get the amount of regular season games reduced back to 78 or something. Just not sure how (or why) they would force the owners to reverse a decision that is clearly more beneficial to players and their travel schedules.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
You’ll have to ask them why they’ve expressed concerns over it. As for myself, I think it makes for a more boring regular season.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 5, 2011 11:56 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
To be honest, I’d rather see the Sharks or Canucks another time at home each season than the Jets 3 times. Though on a competitive level, this helps us.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 12:03 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
insinuating i have direct contact with the NHLPA is kind of dumb, Grizz. Of course I don’t have any way to prove my opinions. That’s why they’re my opinions. But I still have to disagree with you from the players perspective, more players will benefit than those who won’t. I only see Tampa & Florida getting the shaft in this scenario. But how else would you have remedied that situation? they’re outliers as clubs.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
Well you did express a certainty that they couldn’t change anything…….thought maybe you had an in with Fehr. But at least no one said it was moronic now, did they?
I would have only made a few changes to the current divisional format, not a complete overhaul like this. I personally love the late night games on the west coast, but I can see where some might not.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 12:12 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
“Realignment requires an agreement between the league and the NHLPA,” said Players’ Association spokesperson Jonathan Weatherdon. “We look forward to continuing our discussions with the league regarding this matter.”
I stand corrected, I guess they do have to agree before changes can be made. Although I still cannot imagine how this would be a detriment to players?
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
YES
they have no say other than the owners possibly not wanting to upset them w/ a new cba on the horizon. actually looks like expansion is coming to me. the union would like that.
an article i read over at yahoo indicated the Red Wings weren’t necessarily for moving to the east as much as they just didn’t want to have to travel west.
As far as rivalries go, division rivalries under the current system are a joke compared to the epic battles of old. you’ll see more carry over from post season to regular season.
last thought:
Getting 20 teams to agree to this four division realignment is as likely as us trading for a top 6 forward (I couldn’t help myself)! :D
I wonder who we’re getting?
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
But I said 4 divisions, not conferences. ;)
Clearly we’re getting Parise now! :D
Looking at our past playoff appearences, we’ve gotten Detroit 3 times and the Hawks once. This new playoff format doesn’t really change things nearly as much as some seem to hope it will.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 5, 2011 11:42 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
i don’t expect realignment to radically change post season success. I do expect it to change the probability of us getting into the playoffs though.
and here’s the blurb from yahoo
Red Wings owner Mike Illitch’s claimed that commissioner Gary Bettman “promised” the Red Wings would move to the Eastern Conference, but Detroit senior VP Jim Devellano tells Ansar Khan of MLive that the real issue is having to travel west twice a season.
yahoo.com article link
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
So basically Bettman lied again? :D
That was probably the selling point to get the Wings to accept the plan, but it still seems to me that if you’re going to have two 8 team conferences and two 7 teams conferences, why not just make the eastern conferences with 8 teams each that are all in the EST? That’s the puzzling part of this.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 12:00 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
great question
i’d venture a guess that the Detroit dominance of the Central division had some factor into them deciding not to leave.
Only other thing I can imagine is that Phoenix is on the verge of moving to the east and they wanted to leave a spot open.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
new thought
maybe in order to achieve the 20 votes needed to garner a change, Bettman agreed to some of the Eastern Conference teams demands to only have 7 per division? only dissenting votes: Winnepeg, Detroit, Tampa, & Florida?
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
only 4 dissenters
per TSN:
The discussion and vote to approve the new realignment plan at the NHL Board of Governors meetings in Pebble Beach, California took an hour on Monday. A total of 26 teams voted in favour of the plan with four teams opposing it.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
Wonder who the dissenters were...
I’d bet money (…as opposed to cookies or something?) that Carolina wasn’t pleased. Who else? The Florida teams, maybe? Colorado? They’re kind of awkwardly located.
Hands go uuppp..... AND THEY STAY THERE!
-nashvillepredators-
Yeah, I would have to think that Carolina and the two Florida teams feel like they got flipped the bird here. Winnipeg can’t be to happy with it either. Only getting to play the Oilers and Flames twice each season doesn’t help their interests..
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 12:54 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
“The chance to stay in our time zone the chance to play two Original Six teams lots (Chicago and Detroit) and other very good teams in that conference and the chance to have every team in the league come into our building every year I think is a real positive,” said Mark Chipman, chairman and governor of the Jets.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
I’m very surprised they were in favor of this. Not that they have much pull being a new team, but not having their Alberta neighbors in the same division seems like it would be a negative for them.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 1:06 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Calgary and Edmonton aren’t that close. The closest team- Calgary is only 2 hours closer of a drive than St Louis… And again… time zone. We all complain about those west coast games. If they were in that division, they wouldn’t play any games in the Central time zone. It’d be like Dallas.. It would suck.
The Jets have a long history with the Oilers and Flames in their past time in Winnipeg, they’ll never regain that with this format. That seems like a shame to me.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 1:27 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I thought I had read somewhere
that Tampa and Florida were placed in their conference to win their vote for this format. Call it the “snowbird factor” for ticket sales.
"I have come here to chew bubblegum and kick ass............and I'm all out of bubblegum."
by Dumont'sShorts on Dec 6, 2011 5:51 AM EST up reply actions
There aren’t enough teams in the Central time zone to create a purely central TZ’d conference and while they could have popped DET and COL into the other 2 conferences, I suspect having the smaller conferences was a little bone thrown to Eastern teams to get them to agree to this. I don’t imagine Detroit and Columbus are too upset. . . There’s a big difference between being in the Easten time zone playing the Central time zone 1 hour +/- and playing western time zone teames with 3 hours +/-. I think our division has been more exception than rule under the current system. The general feeling is rivalries really blow up in the playoffs—why do you think the Ducks hate us so much this year?
by Melissa Vanderpool Wallace on Dec 6, 2011 10:14 AM EST up reply actions
DP's comments on realignment.
"As far as for the Predators, we’re very happy," General Manager David Poile said. "It accomplishes everything we thought would be good for us.
Josh Cooper’s Tennessean article here
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
Cuts down on travel costs, that’s for sure.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 12:01 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Hey, and just think how good having Winnipeg as a division conference rival is for our draw to Atlanta fans?
Yeah, all 10 of them! :D
Sorry, I just couldn’t resist. :)
Dear heavens, the Canes will never make the playoffs again with the Flyers, Pens, Caps and Rangers in their division. Me thinks they were a no vote on this. :(
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 12:07 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
man
yahoo has been cranking out great articles leading up to and including the realignment agreement. props to those guys over there.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
as someone more eloquent than I put it
Divisional playoffs are at the same time awesome and problematic. The notion that we can have the Montreal Canadiens and Boston Bruins battle every year in the quarters or the semifinals is awesome. Ditto the Edmonton Oilers and Calgary Flames or the Pittsburgh Penguins and the Philadelphia Flyers and so on. The playoffs fuel hatred. Hatred sells. The first two rounds are going to be dramatic, blood-soaked affairs every postseason.
But as we wrote this morning: The divisional playoff setup can also lead to redundant, predictable matchups; and to inequity, as teams with higher point totals are squeezed out of the postseason because they play in tougher divisions. (Under this format, the Los Angeles Kings would have missed the playoffs last season despite having more points than the Blackhawks and the Stars.)
The glorious mathematical chaos of the last weekends of the season will give way to something more straightforward. The days of the No. 8 seed rising up to take out the President’s Trophy winner in the first round are done.
hockey connoisseur. t-shirt addict. not famous. nerd.
Well, if the 4th place team has the 8th highest point total between 2 conferences, then it’s the same old matchup in a brand new format.
It seems to me that lowering travel costs and keeping more games in the same time zones (for TV ratings purposes I would suppose) were the prime movers in all of this.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 12:46 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
New Playoffs, Meet the Old Playoffs
The old divisional playoffs of the 80s were brutal awesome affairs. Yes the matchups may get repetitive but it’ll also spill over to the next season and after a couple of seasons you get to where you can’t stand the other teams/cities instead of the mild apathy you get now. Only thing I don’t like is not enough teams make the playoffs, back in the day all but one team made the playoffs in each division.
Our playoff series with the Ducks was pretty a pretty brutal affair. ;)
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 1:32 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Happy Happy Joy Joy
I think this is terrific stuff. The divisions are going to be tougher, but it’s also going to be a lot more fun seeing everybody play during the regular season. I can’t tell you how meh it’s been watching fricking Anaheim 12 times during the season. There are only so many times you can call Corey Perry a fugly hayseed and throw bologna at Ryan Getzlaf before it starts to get stale.
So, Thank You, BOG. And extra thank you to the Carmel Valley Winegrowers’ Association for GETTING THIS B**CH DONE. The 2008 Heller Estate Pinot convinced Burkie that it was a capital idea, mmmm yessss. Nothing like a mouthful of “tart berry and cocoa powder fade” to convince an old codger that parity really does pay off…
Hey BoG...
…. when naming the conferences, the Big Ten has dibs on Leaders and Legends
and I hate hate hate hate intraconference playoffs...
so the conferences that have 8 teams are at a disadvantage to those with 7.
And how did the two “Eastern” conferences end up with 7 teams apiece?
My thoughts are that with this setup it will cause little disruption if/when Phoenix moves east. They will just be plugged I to whatever conference is a better fit.
by jerseypredsfan on Dec 6, 2011 9:08 AM EST up reply actions
Best. Change. Ever.
2 things make this a huge win for most teams.
As of now, we will play 5 or 6 times each year against 6 or 7 other teams and then see every other team in the league once each year. I love this. I would much rather be guaranteed to see Philly, Montreal, Toronto, Pittsburgh, etc twice a year than double up on games with L.A., S.J., Colorado, Phoenix, etc.
The other things is the rivalry effect. Now, you have 7 or 8 teams that have to fight with each other just to make the playoffs as opposed to 15. Then 4 of those have to fight to the death in the first 2 rounds to crown 4 conference champions before moving to 2 rounds of league finals. While winning the Cup will always be second to none, the idea of fighting for the “Norris” conference championship through two rounds of playoffs will make for a very exciting postseason all around and is a lot better way to earn a championship banner than just rocketing through the regular season.
Just a passing thought, but were not our series against the Ducks & Canucks extremely entertaing and exciting? I think Sidney Crosby put it well by saying that this really doesn’t enhance the competitive level for the players, that’s already sky high when they’re in the playoffs, but some fans may like the rivalry aspect better.
Defense keeps you in games........offense wins them!
by Grizzledbear on Dec 6, 2011 11:12 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
Take this comment in the spirit in which its intended;
1. Stop calling people who disagree with you “morons” or saying that defending your point of view is obnoxious. It’s a public forum—everyone gets a chance to talk. And if you can’t defend your assertions, expect to be challenged on them. I do.
2. Tampa is NOT in favor of this format. They do NOT get a ‘snowbird boost" (an assertion that would p*ss off a whole lot of Preds fans if it were made about this town) and they have no trouble selling out games under the current format. (Neither does Florida right now.) You’re talking about gaining 5 home games against far away teams and losing 4 home games against closer teams. How many games do you travel to Canada for? Tampa and Florida also have nearly double the amount of travel as other teams in their “conference.” That’s not something the Florida teams could possibly be expected to approve of.
3. The NHLPA is concerned about this because it’s structurally easier for players in the 7-team divisions to get into the playoffs than those in the 8-team divisions. I don’t know if you’ve noticed, but it’s very difficult to win a Stanley Cup without making the playoffs. It’s also very hard to get your playoff bonuses when you don’t get into the playoffs. They do in fact have a vote on the matter, but they may not be united in their dislike of the scheme or willing to fight over it. On that we shall see.
and now back to your regularly scheduled beating up on each other.
R.I.P. Belak, Rypien, Boogaard, Lokomotiv.
Part Predator, part Lightning.
"Breathe deep. Think of smiley puppies"--@FakeLindback
Among other things, I particularly enjoyed this part of your post:
and now back to your regularly scheduled beating up on each other.
Hands go uuppp..... AND THEY STAY THERE!
-nashvillepredators-

by 






















